Why are weaknesses strengths and strengths weaknesses? What constitutes a strength or a weakness is subject to criteria i. Nothing is purely free, so every action has some sort …of cost, or consequence. When people assess a 'strength', there is inevitably some cost to it so, subject to the criteria, the benefit is the 'strength' and the cost is the 'weakness'.
Would you like to merge this question into it?
MERGE already exists as an alternate of this question. Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?
MERGE exists and is an alternate of. Often, many men from the foreign lands they came across were so enamoured with Alexander that they too willingly joined his army. He never lost a battle he fought.
This is one likely way that he died. Right before he died, he was beginning to lose the absolute loyalty of those people near him. Immediately after his death, his Companions divided up his massive empire amongst themselves. What constitutes a strength or a weakness is subject to criteria i.
Nothing is purely free, so every action has some sort …of cost, or consequence. Since people primarily do actions to benefit themselves, everything has a strength and a weakness.
By depending on a certain strength, you are exposed to the cost and risk of using it. By being weak, you are not dependent on the source of strength and thus its costs. These areas he placed under Maced…onian or local governors. He was planning to go into the western Mediterranean when he died, a move which would have pitted him against Rome and Carthage.
After his death the empire was divided and ruled by his generals who fought spasmodically with each other.
The eastern conquests progressively reverted to native rule. There is an interesting discrepancy in the list of conquests - his alleged defeat of Porus in India hardly fits in with the circumstances: He then helps Porus by defeating local rival tribes and cities for him.
He goes home with his army, leaving Porus in control - a lot of pain for no gain. This is hardly the action of an absolute conqueror who is attempting to take over the whole eastern world, no matter how generous of spirit.
An alternative explanation is that the battle was lost by Alexander, or at least a standoff, and Alexander secured his own withdrawal by aiding Porus first. Never lost a battle he fought because of his smart and tricky strategies.When people assess a 'strength', there is inevitably some cost to it (so, subject to the criteria, the benefit is the 'strength' and the cost is the 'weakness').
Jan 28, · What are some of the weaknesses and strengths of Alexander the Great? I am doing a report and ned a lot of help! What are some strengths and weaknesses of Alexander the Great?
His weakness was that he coudn't stop conquering the pfmlures.com: Resolved. Jan 30, · Alexander was a complex, inscrutable man of passion and iron-will.
The King possessed a keen intellect, with an ability to make quick pfmlures.com: Resolved. Darius's Empire Persia had been the dominant power in the eastern Mediterranean since bc (when Cyrus the Great conquered the kingdom of Lydia in Asia Minor).
Darius I invaded Greece in bc, and his successor Xerxes I had tried again in bc. * Alexander had 6, cavalry, Darius had 30, Alexander the Great and his father, Philip, were very successful as conquerors while ruling the Macedonian Empire. Philip used a combination of bribery, persuasion, tribute and force to keep enemies away and to make sure he got what he wanted.
Macedonian kings . A strength in this category means you feel and experience great love: for yourself, for others, and for God. It gives you meaning, purpose, and fulfillment in life. If this is your strength, you’re likely a favorite among all those who know you, because loving people just make us feel good!